ALERTS — Abhidnya Learning Educational Research & Training Spaces
Abhidnya Learning Educational Research & Training Spaces

Where rigour
meets the
human story.

Research at the intersection of cognitive science, pedagogy, and the AI era.

ALERTS is the dedicated research wing of Abhidnya Learning Spaces — building an evidence base for human-centred learning in a world of intelligent machines. Our work begins where classroom experience ends: in the question of why certain learners thrive when technology amplifies, and why others disappear beneath it.

Founding Statement

“We do not study learning from the outside. We have lived it — across twenty years, four countries, and thousands of classrooms where something real happened when the right question was asked at the right moment.”

20+
Years of classroom research across India, USA, UK & Singapore
2
Original frameworks under active publication — MIL & SLT
5
Research papers in pipeline across pedagogy & cognitive science
1
Hypothesis: cultural learning practices buffer digital cognitive decline
The Research Mission

We are living through the most significant shift in human cognition since the printing press. The question is not whether AI will change how we learn. The question is whether we will notice what we are losing while we celebrate what we are gaining — and whether we will build the evidence base to protect it.

01 —
Anubhava-Led Research
Every ALERTS paper begins in the classroom, not the library. Direct experience is our primary data source. Theory follows evidence.
02 —
Whole Brain Rigour
We apply the same Whole Brain Learning framework to our research design — engaging analytical, creative, relational, and practical dimensions simultaneously.
03 —
Translation as Responsibility
Every paper produced at ALERTS has a plain-language companion. Research that cannot be understood by the teacher in the classroom has not yet finished its journey.
Original Frameworks

Two contributions to the science of learning.

Both frameworks emerged from decades of practice before they were named. They are not theories waiting to be tested. They are observations waiting to be formalised.

Paper 01 · Ready for Submission

The MIL Framework

Management in Learning — The New Pedagogy of Super-Abundance

In an era of infinite information access, the defining human competency is no longer retrieval — it is direction. The MIL Framework repositions Fayol’s classical management function of Directing as the core cognitive skill of the AI-era learner, arguing that the ability to manage one’s own learning process is the irreplaceable human contribution to any human-AI collaboration.

Original Theoretical Contribution
The Distortion Loop — an extension of Shannon & Weaver’s communication model, demonstrating how super-abundant information introduces systematic distortion at the learner’s cognitive input stage.
Request Full Paper
Paper 02 · Ready for Submission

The SLT Framework

Student Learning Taxonomy — Returning Cognitive Authority to the Learner

Bloom’s Taxonomy is a teacher’s tool. It governs how educators design instruction. The Student Learning Taxonomy inverts this — placing the same cognitive architecture in the learner’s hands as a real-time decoding instrument. A student who can identify what a question is asking before attempting to answer it is a fundamentally different kind of learner.

Original Theoretical Contribution
Five diagnostic questions — What, Why, Where, When, How — that transfer cognitive ownership from educator to learner, validated across 20+ years of classroom application in four countries.
Request Full Paper
Principal Researcher

Milind Majalkar

Founder & Director, Abhidnya Learning Spaces

20+ years teaching across India, USA, UK & Singapore
Academic background in Education, Management & Data Science
Founder — ALERTS, Thinking Studio, Learning Cafe, ACES
Developer of Whole Brain Learning curriculum for Grades 5 through lifelong learning
Originator of the MIL Framework and Student Learning Taxonomy
Connect on Research

“I did not develop these frameworks by reading about learning. I developed them by watching what actually happens in a room when a human being encounters an idea they did not expect — and asking, over and over again, why that moment works when it does.”

The research that ALERTS publishes is not borrowed from elsewhere. It is observations made in real classrooms, across four countries, across two decades, and then subjected to the rigour that such observations deserve.

The MIL Framework emerged from watching students disappear beneath the weight of information they had been given every tool to access but no architecture to manage. The SLT emerged from watching capable students lose marks not because they didn’t know the content but because nobody had taught them to read the question.

Both frameworks were practised long before they were published. That sequence — anubhava first, theory second — is the epistemological foundation of all ALERTS research.

Research Pipeline

What is being built next.

ALERTS operates a rolling research agenda. Current and forthcoming papers across pedagogy, cognitive science, and learning in the AI era.

Ready
P01
The New Pedagogy of Super-Abundance: Managing Learning in an Age of Information Infinity
Target: Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence (Elsevier) · Track B: Rupkatha Journal
Introduces the MIL Framework and the Distortion Loop. Argues that Fayol’s Directing function is the defining human competency of the AI era. Full paper, 8 sections, 29 APA 7th references.
Ready
P02
The Student Learning Taxonomy: Inverting Bloom’s for Cognitive Ownership
Target: Journal of Educational Technology and Society
Presents the SLT as a learner-facing inversion of Bloom’s Taxonomy. Introduces five diagnostic questions that transfer cognitive authority from educator to student. Validated across 20+ years of classroom application.
In Progress
P03
The Cultural Cognition Hypothesis: Do Indian Educational Practices Buffer Digital Cognitive Decline?
Target: International Journal of Educational Research
Proposes that parental involvement, foundational rigor, and temporal structure in Indian educational culture may serve as protective factors against digital cognitive decline. Research study design complete. Data collection forthcoming.
Planned
P04 — P07
Working Paper Series — Forthcoming
ALERTS Working Papers · Zenodo DOI Series
Covering: The Verification Gap (automation and foundational literacy), Digital Cognitive Hygiene (learning practices in AI-saturated environments), Pramana and Critical Thinking (Indian epistemology as a framework for AI-era discernment), and The Tangent Human (philosophical foundations of human irreplaceability).
Research Collaboration

If this work
resonates with yours,
let us think together.

ALERTS welcomes dialogue with researchers, educators, institutional partners, and practitioners who are working at the intersection of learning, cognition, and technology. We are particularly interested in collaborative research, peer review, co-authorship, and institutional partnerships.

Receive updates when new papers are published or submitted
Request access to full working papers and preprints
Explore co-authorship or collaborative research design
Connect for institutional partnerships or speaking engagements
Start the conversation